The 5-stage project development cycle and financial decision points
A map of the five stages of a property project: cash inflows and outflows, the J-curve, Peak Funding and financial decision points
5stages, each with a Go / No-Go gate
5–7 yearstypical duration of a condo project
~70%of cash comes in at ownership transfer
56%Peak Funding relative to cost, in the example
5 stages, 5 questionsThe financial decisions in a condo-for-sale project fall into 5 stages, each with its own Go / No-Go gate.
Control Peak Funding, not just IRRCash goes out first, and the large inflow arrives at transfer. The figure to control throughout is the maximum funding that has to be raised.
Overlapping stagesSeveral stages run in parallel, so durations are given as ranges and cannot simply be added together.
01 · Fundamentals
Why divide a project into stages
A project can be profitable on paper yet short of liquidity. Monthly P&L does not show a project's health. What does is cumulative cash flow, Peak Funding and returns over the life of the project. Dividing the project into stages shows when the next sum of money will be committed and which conditions must be met first.
Heavy capital requirementCapital-intensive
Land and construction costs must be paid before any revenue arrives, so the capital structure has to be set up from day one.
Lengthy cycleLong cycle
From buying the land to closing the project takes several years. Interest rates, costs and the market can all change along the way.
Cash flow arrives in lumpsLumpy cash flow
Most revenue comes in when customers take ownership transfer, by which time most costs have already been paid.
02 · Overview
The 5-stage map of a project
Each stage is organised around the financial question that must be answered before committing the next sum of money. Click a stage name to read the details.
How to take the money back, and whether to keep the company
Main tasks
Sell unsold units, close the accounts, tax, return equity to shareholders
Cash
Remaining cash, corporate income tax (CIT), dividends
Hold or Liquidate
How the stages overlap (example: 72-month project)
1Land & Feasibility
LandDesign, EIA, permits
2Funding & Presale
Funding and Presale
3Construction
Construction 36 months
4Transfer & Closing
Transfer
5Exit & Hold
ExitContinued holding
012243648607284
Unit: months · Funding and Presale work starts before all permits have been issued. Actual durations depend on the status of the land, the EIA and the size of the project. The whole project typically takes 5–7 years.
The land stage takes 1–6 months. If the title is clean, zoning is clear and the owner is ready to sell, it may finish in 1–3 months. If there are encumbrances, height restrictions or several rounds of negotiation, plan for 3–6 months. The EIA is the most volatile variable in Stage 1.
03 · Cash flow
Cash in and out at each stage
Approximate share of total outflows and total inflows over the life of the project. Stages 1 and 2 run in parallel, so they are shown together.
Outflows (% of total outflows)Inflows (% of total inflows)
Stages 1–2Land, permits, equity, Presale
Outflows
Inflows
Stage 3Construction
Outflows
Inflows
Stage 4Transfer & Closing
Outflows
Inflows
Stage 5Exit & Hold
Outflows
Inflows
04 · Worked example
J-curve and Peak Funding
The J-curve is the cumulative cash flow over the life of the project. It starts negative because there are only outflows, falls to its lowest point, which is Peak Funding, and then turns positive as transfer proceeds come in. This example is a 247-unit condominium with sales value of THB 2,800 m and cost of THB 2,100 m.
Peak FundingTHB 1,176 m56% of total cost · month 53
Cash collected before transferTHB 672 m24% of receipts
Cash break-even~month 65about 1 year after transfers begin
Profit before income taxTHB 700 m25% of receipts
Cumulative cash flow (THB million)
Background bands show Stages 1–5 · horizontal axis in months
View figures by point
End of month
Cumulative (THB m)
Event
6
-440
Land purchase complete
12
-460
Booking deposits start
18
-400
Booking deposits come in before construction starts
24
-355
Down payments start to come in; construction work still light
36
-728
Peak construction period
48
-1,077
Down payments fully collected
53
-1,176
Peak Funding before transfers begin
60
-486
Transfers under way
66
+107
Turns positive
72
+700
Project closed; profit before corporate income tax
Cost
THB m
Proportion
Month
Land
420
20%
1–6
Construction
1,155
55%
18–54
Soft Cost
210
10%
1–72
Financing Cost
168
8%
6–72
Taxes and fees
147
7%
54–72
Total cost
2,100
100%
Receipts
THB m
Proportion
Month
Booking and contract deposits
168
6%
12–24
Down payments
504
18%
18–48
Transfer payments
2,128
76%
54–72
Total receipts
2,800
100%
Spread monthly, with construction cost following an S-curve and other items spread evenly. All figures are illustrative examples for educational purposes.
Sensitivity test: Peak Funding of 56% of cost is below the 60–75% rule of thumb because 24% of receipts are collected before transfer. If pre-transfer cash falls to 15% (moving THB 252 m to be received at transfer), Peak Funding rises to about THB 1,428 m, or 68% of cost. You can test this on your own project using the calculators
ReturnIRR · NPV
Is it worth investing in?
Debt service capacityDSCR · LTC · LTV
Will lenders accept it?
LiquidityPeak Funding · Cash Balance
Is there enough cash to last until transfer day?
If IRR is high but Peak Funding exceeds what can be raised, the project cannot proceed. The model used for decisions must therefore always show all three perspectives together.
5 ways to reduce Peak Funding
Presale-firstAccelerate sales before construction starts, which reduces external funding and allows better loan terms to be negotiated.
Phased developmentUse cash from the first phase to fund the next, in exchange for a longer timeline.
Payment schedule designCollecting down payment instalments earlier reduces the peak directly, but this must be balanced against customer acceptance and cancellation risk.
Supplier and counterparty creditCredit terms from material suppliers, contractor retention and performance bonds in place of cash.
Capital structureMezzanine debt, preferred equity or a JV reduce the equity burden, at the cost of higher financing cost and complexity.
05 · Decision gates
Decision points across the 5 stages
Before passing each gate, review the figures from all three perspectives again. If the gate is not passed, the options are to adjust the plan, delay, or stop before committing the next sum of money.
How to take the money back, and whether to keep the company
Gates to pass
Final financial statements
Actual IRR vs plan
Hold or Liquidate
The Presale and Covenant thresholds in this set apply where a lender specifies them. If funding comes from bonds, a JV or mezzanine debt, the conditions come from the contract with that source of funds.